Obamacare Not A Economic Plus?

Surprise, surprise surprise.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney implicitly retreated from President Obama's argument that Obamacare was a crucial part of his economic agenda.

Nancy Pelosi needs to explain this again.

Its The Dogfood

Charles doesn't like the taste either.

“That’s nonsense. It’s not the advertising, it’s the dogfood. Anytime someone has a lick of it they don’t like it.”

Via GWP

Liar In Chief (still a liar) Lies Again

If his lips move he's lying.

As many as 20 million Americans could lose their employer-provided coverage because of President Obama’s healthcare reform law, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new report Thursday.

The figure represents the worst-case scenario, CBO says, and the law could just as well increase the number of people with employer-based coverage by 3 million in 2019.

They are finally getting around to reading this POS eh?

Obamascare

Unfrigging believable...

President Obama’s national health care law will cost $1.76 trillion over a decade, according to a new projection released today by the Congressional Budget Office, rather than the $940 billion forecast when it was signed into law.

A slight overrun in costs.

More Proof Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder

I don't even know where to start with this.
 

There is no way in hell any of these geniuses read this piece of sh*t bill.

The Gospel According To Obama

Obama is the author of two Gospels. 
HHS Director Sebelius can't take credit for her lame Gospel as Krauthammer correctly points out...She works for him. 

This is way more than an attack on Catholics.

Catholic soup kitchens do not demand religious IDs from either the hungry they feed or the custodians they employ. Catholic charities and hospitals — even Catholic schools — do not turn away Hindu or Jew.

Their vocation is universal, precisely the kind of universal love-thy-neighbor vocation that is the very definition of religiosity as celebrated by the Gospel of Obama. Yet according to the Gospel of Sebelius, these very same Catholic institutions are not religious at all — under the secularist assumption that religion is what happens on Sunday under some Gothic spire, while good works are “social services” properly rendered up unto Caesar.

That damn piece of paper Obama hates is in his way again...

Such exemptions are granted in grudging recognition that, whereas the rest of civil society may be broken to the will of the state’s regulators, our quaint Constitution grants special autonomy to religious institutions.

I will be really curious as to the treatment of the Muslim folk's birth control and abortion issues under Obamacare, will they get a pass?
Anyone heard from Jeremiah Wright for his take?

White House To "Acommodate" Religious Organizations?

I believe nothing from this liar...

With the White House under fire for its new rule requiring employers including religious organizations to offer health insurance that fully covers birth control coverage, ABC News has learned that later today the White House — possibly President Obama himself — will likely announce an attempt to accommodate these religious groups.

The move, based on state models, will almost certainly not satisfy bishops and other religious leaders since it will preserve the goal of women employees having their birth control fully covered by health insurance.

Sources say it will be respectful of religious beliefs but will not back off from that goal, which many religious leaders oppose since birth control is in violation of their religious beliefs.

Nothing more than spin to make the Catholics look like the bad folks, and Chicago Jesus to look like the great healer.

Update.
I am not the only one who sees this as trickery. Believe nothing from these thugs.

Government Grows

And grows, and grows...

WTF?
Too complicated to find the death panels.